Consumer Health Care Interests at Stake

By Lynne Ide

Screen Shot 2015-02-23 at 3.36.02 PMIt’s that time in the legislative session when public hearings are happening daily.  Numerous proposed health care-related bills are getting a day on the policy stage, vying for enough support to move out of committee and onto the floor of the House or Senate for full debate.

Vested interests and professional advocates are sure to weigh in – but rarely do everyday people brave the public hearing process.  There are many reasons for the lack of consumer input, which highlight a serious flaw in the way legislators weigh the merits of proposed legislation.

Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut submitted testimony on several bills this week.  You can read our testimony here.

Public Health Committee:

  • HB 5325 requires for-profit hospitals to abide by the same standard applied to nonprofit hospitals to complete a Community Health Needs Assessment every three years.  This helps ensure that all hospitals operating in the state maintain connections to the communities they serve and develop plans to address local health care needs.
  • HB 5324 takes steps to more clearly define “urgent care clinics,” in order to best serve the patients who use these facilities and protect against unnecessary costs.

Insurance & Real Estate Committee:

  • SB 9 & SB 413  open up health insurance rate review to a more robust, consumer-oriented input process.  To-date, insurance premium rate approval has been the opposite of consumer-friendly.  These bills represent a step in the right direction.
  • SB 754 excludes health insurance companies that do not offer health plans in the state health insurance exchange, Access Health CT (AHCT), from being assessed fees to support the administration of AHCT.  This bill could transfer more cost to the consumers who buy health coverage via AHCT – and potentially limit the choice of plans offered in the exchange.  (Note: The Affordable Care Act requires all state-based exchanges to be self-sustaining, thus the fees.)

We’ll keep you updated on these and other bills as they move through the legislative process.

This entry was posted in From the Foundation, Lynne Ide and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Consumer Health Care Interests at Stake

  1. Alex G. says:

    We talk about fixing, or improving the current health care “system” in CT. I think we need to stop using the word ‘system.’ The word implies a there is an organized whole comprised of elements working interactively and/or in parrallel towards a common goal. This requires considerable communication, interdependencies, collaboration, and cybernetic feedback both from internal and external sources to make adjustments as needed to achieve optimal performance. Obviously the purpose of a omnibus bill is a start to create that. The human body is actually a collection of systems, and is a great example of the interdependency of these systems to the survival on the individual, and thus the survival of the human species. The health care system should be an evolutionary enhancement that helps individuals achieve and maintain their inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Not a opportunistic institution that preys on the sick for profit. While profit is not contrary to achieving success, it should not be done at the expense of its consumers with inelastic economies that threaten their safety and security. It is obscene, for example, that medical providers can turn their patients to collection agencies, and consumer have little recourse. This, I think, is surely a symptom of fragmented providers severely fractured, and have forgotten that to heal is to make whole… Both individually and collectively.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s